Early cypherpunk Adam Again, cited by Satoshi Nakamoto within the Bitcoin white paper, steered that quantum computing strain could reveal whether or not the blockchain’s pseudonymous creator is alive.
Throughout an interview after a Q&A session on the “Satoshi Spritz” occasion in Turin on April 18, Again steered that quantum computing could drive Nakamoto to maneuver their Bitcoin (BTC). That’s as a result of, in response to Again, Bitcoin holders can be compelled to maneuver their belongings to newer, quantum-resistant signature-based addresses.
Again stated that present quantum computers do not pose a credible threat to Bitcoin’s cryptography however will seemingly threaten it sooner or later. Again estimated that quantum computer systems could evolve to that extent in “possibly 20 years.”
Associated: Bitcoin’s quantum-resistant hard fork is inevitable — It’s the only chance to fix node incentives
When the menace turns into actual, Again stated the Bitcoin neighborhood should select between deprecating outdated, susceptible addresses or letting these funds be stolen:
“If the quantum computer systems are right here, and folks at universities and analysis labs have entry, the community has a option to both let folks steal them or to freeze them — to deprecate the signature.“
Again expects the neighborhood to go together with the previous possibility, forcing Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator to maneuver their funds in the event that they want to keep away from dropping them.
Privateness upgrades might complicate proof
Nonetheless, Again stated that whether or not such a scenario will reveal if Satoshi Nakamoto is alive additionally depends upon Bitcoin’s future privateness options.
“It relies upon a bit on the expertise, there are some analysis concepts that would add privateness to Bitcoin,” Again stated. “So, probably there is perhaps a strategy to repair quantum points whereas conserving privateness.“
Associated: Lawyer sues US Homeland Dept to probe supposed Satoshi Nakamoto meeting
Nonetheless, not everyone seems to be satisfied that — privateness enhancements or not — such a situation would reveal whether or not Nakamoto was alive. An nameless early Bitcoin miner and member of the Bitcoin neighborhood instructed Cointelegraph that he doesn’t anticipate Nakamoto’s cash to be moved:
“Even when he’s alive and holds the personal keys, I don’t suppose he’d transfer them. Primarily based on how he acted up to now I might quite anticipate him to let the neighborhood to resolve.”
He added that, since this can be a controversial selection, it is sensible to let the neighborhood resolve. He stated that he’d be stunned if Nakamoto got here out of the woodwork to maneuver the belongings.
A quantum-resistant Bitcoin
Again defined that the majority quantum-resistant signature implementations are both unproven by way of safety or very costly from an information perspective. He cited Lamport signatures as an outdated and confirmed design, however identified that they weigh tens of kilobytes.
Consequently, he steered that Bitcoin needs to be ready to change to quantum-resistant signatures however solely achieve this when crucial. He steered a Bitcoin taproot-based implementation permitting addresses to change to quantum-resistant signatures when wanted.
Journal: Bitcoin vs. the quantum computer threat: Timeline and solutions (2025–2035)
